<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quarterly Financial Performance Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/</link>
	<description>The Hard Truth about Money and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MasterPo</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6116</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterPo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=4652#comment-6116</guid>
		<description>The R bonds as I understand them are still a debt obligation of the U.S. Treasury. So whether the treasury has to pay bonds back to SS or to the public it&#039;s still on the shoulders of the fed.

IMO this is a back-door into an Al Frankin style proposal to have the government &quot;guarantee&quot; &quot;private&quot; retirement funds that otherwise would be in stocks and non-gov bonds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The R bonds as I understand them are still a debt obligation of the U.S. Treasury. So whether the treasury has to pay bonds back to SS or to the public it&#8217;s still on the shoulders of the fed.</p>
<p>IMO this is a back-door into an Al Frankin style proposal to have the government &#8220;guarantee&#8221; &#8220;private&#8221; retirement funds that otherwise would be in stocks and non-gov bonds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. ToughMoneyLove</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. ToughMoneyLove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=4652#comment-6108</guid>
		<description>Master Po&#039;s - As I hope you discovered, the 10 speed portfolio uses low cost index funds, mostly Vanguard.  

If R bonds are done right, it could take some of the pressure off Social Security.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Master Po&#8217;s &#8211; As I hope you discovered, the 10 speed portfolio uses low cost index funds, mostly Vanguard.  </p>
<p>If R bonds are done right, it could take some of the pressure off Social Security.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterPo</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6107</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterPo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=4652#comment-6107</guid>
		<description>OK, I found the 10 speed. Still have to think about it.

As for the R&#039;s, that scares me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I found the 10 speed. Still have to think about it.</p>
<p>As for the R&#8217;s, that scares me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterPo</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6106</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterPo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=4652#comment-6106</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t find anything about a &quot;10 speed&quot; portfolio on the Assetbuilder website.

But if you look at the comparison to Vanguard index funds, the returns as a whole are NOT that impressive for the fees. :-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t find anything about a &#8220;10 speed&#8221; portfolio on the Assetbuilder website.</p>
<p>But if you look at the comparison to Vanguard index funds, the returns as a whole are NOT that impressive for the fees. <img src='http://toughmoneylove.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':-(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. ToughMoneyLove</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6056</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. ToughMoneyLove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=4652#comment-6056</guid>
		<description>MasterPo - I don&#039;t have all of my portfolio posted so I probably should do that. The core of my 401(k) holdings generally track Scott Burns&#039; &quot;10 speed&quot; portfolio.

I follow I-Bonds closely. I bought mine earlier this decade, when the fixed interest rates were between 4.1% and 6.62%. Considering that the inflation adjustment is added to this, there are lots of folks who would be thrilled to get those rates today. I don&#039;t expect much movement in the fixed rate this Nov. 1 but next May they probably will become attractive again.  Or, the rumored &quot;R bond&quot; may be introduced which will be huge for retirement savers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MasterPo &#8211; I don&#8217;t have all of my portfolio posted so I probably should do that. The core of my 401(k) holdings generally track Scott Burns&#8217; &#8220;10 speed&#8221; portfolio.</p>
<p>I follow I-Bonds closely. I bought mine earlier this decade, when the fixed interest rates were between 4.1% and 6.62%. Considering that the inflation adjustment is added to this, there are lots of folks who would be thrilled to get those rates today. I don&#8217;t expect much movement in the fixed rate this Nov. 1 but next May they probably will become attractive again.  Or, the rumored &#8220;R bond&#8221; may be introduced which will be huge for retirement savers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MasterPo</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2009/10/01/quarterly-financial-performance-update/comment-page-1/#comment-6048</link>
		<dc:creator>MasterPo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=4652#comment-6048</guid>
		<description>TML - Do you have your total portfolio holdings posted somewhere?

ps- I wouldn&#039;t put too much faith in those inflation protected bonds. Take a look at the Treasury&#039;s website under I-bonds. The rate is ZERO-%!! Afterall, Lord Obama says there was no inflation in 2009 and won&#039;t be in 2010 either. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TML &#8211; Do you have your total portfolio holdings posted somewhere?</p>
<p>ps- I wouldn&#8217;t put too much faith in those inflation protected bonds. Take a look at the Treasury&#8217;s website under I-bonds. The rate is ZERO-%!! Afterall, Lord Obama says there was no inflation in 2009 and won&#8217;t be in 2010 either. <img src='http://toughmoneylove.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
