<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Investor Alert &#8211; Nintendo Wii and Game Console Stocks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toughmoneylove.com/2008/08/21/investor-alert-nintendo-wii-and-game-console-stocks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2008/08/21/investor-alert-nintendo-wii-and-game-console-stocks/</link>
	<description>The Hard Truth about Money and Personal Finance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:03:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mr. ToughMoneyLove</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2008/08/21/investor-alert-nintendo-wii-and-game-console-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. ToughMoneyLove</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=56#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Nickel:  The Hillcrest patent claims priority to a patent application filed in 2004.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nickel:  The Hillcrest patent claims priority to a patent application filed in 2004.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fivecentnickel.com</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2008/08/21/investor-alert-nintendo-wii-and-game-console-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>fivecentnickel.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=56#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Interesting. I&#039;m no lawyer, so I&#039;m curious as to how a patent issued in August 2008 could give them precedence on a product introduced back in 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. I&#8217;m no lawyer, so I&#8217;m curious as to how a patent issued in August 2008 could give them precedence on a product introduced back in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyGrubbingLawyer</title>
		<link>http://toughmoneylove.com/2008/08/21/investor-alert-nintendo-wii-and-game-console-stocks/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>MoneyGrubbingLawyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toughmoneylove.com/?p=56#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up, Mr. ToughMoneyLove.

Patent disputes can wreak havoc on share prices. Just look at RIM&#039;s share price during its dispute with NTP...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up, Mr. ToughMoneyLove.</p>
<p>Patent disputes can wreak havoc on share prices. Just look at RIM&#8217;s share price during its dispute with NTP&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
